Many of you are too young to remember, but in 1975 our government
pushed "the coming ice age." Random House dutifully printed "THE
WEATHER CONSPIRACY … coming of the New Ice Age." This may be the
only book ever written by 18 authors. All 18 lived just a short
sled ride from Washington, D.C. Newsweek fell in line and did a
cover issue warning us of global cooling on April 28, 1975. And The
New York Times, Aug. 14, 1976, reported "many signs that Earth may
be headed for another ice age." OK, you say, that's media. But what
did our rational scientists say? In 1974, the National Science
Board announced: "During the last 20 to 30 years, world temperature
has fallen, irregularly at first but more sharply over the last
decade. Judging from the record of the past interglacial ages, the
present time of high temperatures should be drawing to an
end…leading into the next ice age." You can't blame these
scientists for sucking up to the fed's mantra du jour. Scientists
live off grants. Remember how Galileo recanted his preaching about
the earth revolving around the sun? He, of course, was about to be
barbecued by his leaders. Today's scientists merely lose their cash
flow. Threats work. In 2002 I stood in a room of the Smithsonian.
One entire wall charted the cooling of our globe over the last 60
million years. This was no straight line. The curve had two steep
dips followed by leveling. There were no significant warming
periods. Smithsonian scientists inscribed it across some 20 feet of
plaster, with timelines. Last year, I went back. That fresco is
painted over. The same curve hides behind smoked glass, shrunk to
three feet but showing the same cooling trend. Hey, why should the
Smithsonian put its tax-free status at risk? If the politicians
decide to whip up public fear in a different direction, get with
it, oh ye subsidized servants. Downplay that embarrassing old chart
and maybe nobody will notice. Sorry, I noticed. It's the job of
elected officials to whip up panic. They then get re-elected. Their
supporters fall in line. Al Gore thought he might ride his global
warming crusade back toward the White House. If you saw his movie,
which opened showing cattle on his farm, you start to understand
how shallow this is. The United Nations says that cattle, farting
and belching methane, create more global warming than all the SUVs
in the world. Even more laughably, Al and his camera crew flew
first class for that film, consuming 50% more jet fuel per
seat-mile than coach fliers, while his Tennessee mansion sucks as
much carbon as 20 average homes. His PR folks say he's "carbon
neutral" due to some trades. I'm unsure of how that works, but,
maybe there's a tribe in the Sudan that cannot have a campfire for
the next hundred years to cover Al's energy gluttony. I'm just not
sophisticated enough to know how that stuff works. But I do
understand he flies a private jet when the camera crew is gone. The
fall of Saigon in the '70s may have distracted the shrill
pronouncements about the imminent ice age. Science's prediction of
"A full-blown, 10,000 year ice age," came from its March 1, 1975
issue. The Christian Science Monitor observed that armadillos were
retreating south from Nebraska to escape the "global cooling" in
its Aug. 27, 1974 issue. That armadillo caveat seems reminiscent of
today's tales of polar bears drowning due to glaciers disappearing.
While scientists march to the drumbeat of grant money, at least
trees don't lie. Their growth rings show what's happened no matter
which philosophy is in power. Tree rings show a mini ice age in
Europe about the time Stradivarius crafted his violins. Chilled
Alpine Spruce gave him tighter wood so the instruments sang with a
new purity. But England had to give up the wines that the Romans
cultivated while our globe cooled, switching from grapes to colder
weather grains and learning to take comfort with beer, whisky and
ales. Yet many centuries earlier, during a global warming,
Greenland was green. And so it stayed and was settled by Vikings
for generations until global cooling came along. Leif Ericsson even
made it to Newfoundland. His shallow draft boats, perfect for
sailing and rowing up rivers to conquer villages, wouldn't have
stood a chance against a baby iceberg. Those sustained temperature
swings, all before the evil economic benefits of oil consumption,
suggest there are factors at work besides humans. Today, as I peck
out these words, the weather channel is broadcasting views of a
freakish and early snow falling on Dallas. The Iowa state extension
service reports that the record corn crop expected this year will
have unusually large kernels, thanks to "relatively cool August and
September temperatures." And on Jan. 16, 2007, NPR went politically
incorrect, briefly, by reporting that "An unusually harsh winter
frost, the worst in 20 years, killed much of the California citrus,
avocados and flower crops." To be fair, those reports are
short-term swings. But the longer term changes are no more
compelling, unless you include the ice ages, and then, perhaps, the
panic attempts of the 1970s were right. Is it possible that if we
put more CO2 in the air, we'd forestall the next ice age? I can ask
"outrageous" questions like that because I'm not dependent upon
government money for my livelihood. From the witch doctors of old
to the elected officials today, scaring the bejesus out of the
populace maintains their status. Sadly, the public just learned
that our scientific community hid data and censored critics. Maybe
the feds should drop this crusade and focus on our health care
crisis. They should, of course, ignore the life insurance
statistics that show every class of American and both genders are
living longer than ever. That's another inconvenient fact. Gary
Sutton is co-founder of Teledesic and has been CEO of several other
companies, including Knight Protective Industries and @Backup.